Banner image

Trustee and Beneficiary Fight Over Interpretation of Their Father’s Trust…..Yet Again

News & Blog Dec 05, 2017

Trustees in California have a duty to administer a trust solely in the interest of the beneficiaries and to avoid conflicts of interest. Failure to comply with this simple directive is one of the biggest sources of litigation between trustees and beneficiaries. In a recent case, the California Court of Appeals reviewed the actions of a trustee. The Court of Appeals affirmed the superior court’s order to sell the home. O’Reilly v. O’Reilly, 2017 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 6937 (Cal. App. 2d Dist. Oct. 10, 2017).

A trust was established by the family patriarch (Patrick) who died in 2002. Patrick left a widow, Julie, and three adult children (Kevin, Cyril, and Ann). Kevin was the successor trustee and became the trustee when Patrick’s died.

The trust permitted the trustor’s widow to remain in the home as long as she wanted, then the home and remaining assets were to be distributed to the trustor’s three children. After Patrick’s death, his widow lived in the house for a few years then signed a document waiving any further interest in the property. Kevin, as the trustee, then was obligated to distribute the house and furnishings according to the terms of the trust.

As frequently is the case, the three children couldn’t agree on what to do with the house. In California, it is common to have the family home as the largest trust asset. Here, because the family could not decide what to do with the home, Kevin filed a petition to determine whether the trust granted him permission to sell the house. The trust provided that, after Patrick’s died, the trustee:

…shall hold the Settlor’s residence together with its furniture and furnishings for the use of [wife]. She shall be permitted to live in the house rent free. At such time as [wife] dies or permanently ceases to use the home as her residence, then the home together with its furniture and furnishings shall be distributed as follows….

The trust listed certain items of personal property to be distributed to each of the three children. It then said that the rest of the residence and furnishings was to be distributed as provided for the distribution of the residue of the trust estate (to the children).

The trust also explained the trustee’s power to sell trust assets, stating that:

The Trustee of this trust shall have all of the powers granted to Trustees by law (including the powers granted under California Probate Code §§ 16220-16249 inclusive which shall be broadly interpreted) and by this instrument. The powers specifically listed herein are for convenience only and are not to be interpreted as restricting the powers of the Trustee. Among the powers conferred on the Trustee are the following:… To buy, sell, and invest trust property.

Kevin tried to sell the house in several ways, but Cyril didn’t like any option. Cyril contended that settlor’s wife had abandoned her interest in the house years before—and that Kevin breached the trust by using the house for his and his sister’s benefit, and depriving Cyril of his fair share.

Cyril argued that the trust language that the house be “distributed” to the beneficiaries required that the house itself be transferred, and prevented it from being sold. The court ruled the trust instrument granted the trustee the power to sell the property, and specifically overruled all of Cyril’s objections. The court then signed a formal order authorizing the sale. Cyril appealed.

Acting Presiding Judge Laurence D. Rubin of the California Second District Court of Appeals wrote that the Probate Code states that a trustee has the powers conferred by the trust instrument, and except as limited in the trust instrument, the powers conferred by statute. The judge noted that the statutory powers include California Probate Code § 16226 which provides “the power to acquire or dispose of property, for cash or on credit, at public or private sale, or by exchange.” These powers weren’t limited by the trust, which specifically provided that the trustee had all the statutory powers and that they were to be broadly interpreted. The trust itself mentioned sale as one of the trustee’s powers.

Cyril argued that the trust contains a specific provision prohibiting sale of the house. Cyril argued that the trust language required that the house be “distributed” to the children. He maintained the use of the word “distribute” required a transfer of title to the children, and didn’t permit a sale and distribution of equivalent value.

The Court of Appeals disagreed. Judge Rubin explained that in this particular trust, “distributed” must mean a transfer of title, because the same word is used when discussing the disposition of individual items of personal property which were likely intended to be given to each of the individual children, not sold for fair market value. Plus, “distributed” is also used in the context of other distributions which were likely not intended to be distributions of title in equal shares.

Judge Rubin said that the Court didn’t think it likely that “Patrick intended each of his children to share title to each remaining chair, lamp, and coffee mug in the house.” The Court noted that Cyril’s argument that “distributed” is restricted to a transfer in kind everywhere it appears in the trust would lead to absurd results.

Finally, Judge Rubin pointed out a rather obvious fact: Kevin’s right to sell the property as trustee avoided a lengthy court battle which would’ve resulted in the same end. Judge Rubin explained that a house can’t be divided into three separate parcels—there has to be a sale and division of proceeds.


The takeaway from this case is twofold: 1) Make sure that your drafting attorney crafts language that reflects its conformity to the statute (which is well established and interpreted by many cases) to avoid lack of clarity as to what the testator intended OR that clearly defines how it should deviate from the statute. Additionally, trust administration (the process of a trustee following the trust’s terms at the right time) should include disclosure and communication to beneficiaries to avoid a dispute. Finally, get advice about the likely interpretations of the court and best strategy to get court intervention from an expert, namely an attorney who is well-versed in Probate litigation.

If you have questions about trusts and the powers and responsibilities of a trustee, contact NM Law, APC (949-253-0000) to speak to a trust administration attorney. We encourage you to take advantage of our superior skill and knowledge and to speak with us today to get answers to your questions about trusts.


Disclaimer: This article is intended to provide a general summary of laws in the State of California and should not be construed as a legal opinion nor a complete legal analysis of the subject matter. Noelle Minto is an attorney at NM Law, APC in Tustin, California, a law firm specializing in Trusts & Estates and Business Transactions.


Ms. Minto has been a business and estates transactional attorney based in California since 2003. Her practice is now located in Tustin, CA but represents individuals and entities based throughout the United States and abroad. Phone: (949) 253-0000, Email:


  • NM Law is an excellent law firm to work with! Noelle and her team are very thorough and knowledgeable. They explained the estate planning process to us and kept us informed every step of the way. We…

    Monique S
  • I greatly appreciate Noelle’s assistance in making difficult decisions. When she provides counsel I know she puts herself and her family in my shoes. I feel comfortable knowing my attorney has analyzed every angle and leaves out…

    Cinda H.
  • For those of you that are looking for the perfect attorney to handle any of your estate issues, well Noelle is the one for you! I can’t say enough about Noelle! She recently handled a case for…

    Suzie F.
  • One of the most important things you can do for your family is have a good Living Trust done by an attorney you can trust to take care of your business. I highly recommend Noelle Minto, an…

    Sandy Z.
  • Working with Noelle on litigation and transactional matters was truly a valuable experience for me. Not only was she a great communicator with clients and personnel, but zealous and passionate about her clients. I would recommend her…

    Darren S.
  • I’ve known Noelle as a colleague and friend for close to seven years. Working “across the aisle” in the fast-paced and partisan world of LA County politics, I found Noelle remarkable for her ability to quickly grasp…

    Kerjon L.
  • Noelle and her team were professional, courteous and diligent with my case. It was a small matter but they took it as though it was a large one. They reached a settlement quickly and very little effort…

    Doug S.
  • After my mother’s death, The bank locked all her accounts and the insurance company was playing games. Our family lawyer never call me back. I called Noelle for help! My paper work was not in order at…

    Randy B.
  • Noelle is awesome. Handled everything I needed in a timely manner. Very professional!

    Tammy W.
  • I have worked with Noelle on my Estate Planning and was very impressed by the way she handled my business. Noelle was extremely professional and available for all my questions. I would highly recommend anyone looking for…

    Zac C.
  • I have worked with many attorneys, and there are very few that I would ever recommend. Noelle and her team have gone above and beyond to help all of our clients that we have referred to her….

    Robert Sousa
  • I was first referred to Noelle Minto by my family law attorney Mike Monarch to provide oversight on my husband’s Trust conforming with our Post Marital Agreement. Her outstanding legal insights helped me to feel secure that…

    Sharon McCubbin
  • Noelle and Samantha and their team are amazing. They are extremely knowledgeable and professional (they are the best). They have and continue to support me and my family while dealing with my parents Will and Trust. Samantha…

    Greg Bishop
  • I had a great experience with Noelle and Samantha at NM Law. They were fast, clear and got the result we wanted under budget. I am very happy and impressed.

    John Arens
  • NM Law is an exceptional place to work! Our office is located in the City of Tustin, off the 55 Freeway, between the 5 and 405 Freeways. Our main cross streets are Redhill Avenue and Edinger Avenue…

    Samantha Smith
  • The N.W Law team in Tustin Ca was instrumental in achieving a just result in our family trust dispute. We had the privilege of being represented by Samantha Smith and her staff, during one of my saddest…

    Herman baldonado
  • Amazing service. So happy with the whole team!

    Mitchell Hilde
  • So glad to work with this team of professionals

    Noelle Minto
  • As an attorney who has used two other wills & trusts lawyers prior to seeing Noelle, I have a pretty good idea of what to expect and what it should cost. I recommend Noelle to anyone who…

    Lynne Boisineau
  • Highly recommend NM Law. I recently worked with Noelle and her team on my family trust and the process could not have gone smoother. Very knowledgeable and professional. I have since recommended all of my family members…

    Nathan Perkins
  • A very professional approach and action to fulfill our personal requirements

    Waldo ortega
  • My husband and I decided to update our 12 year old trust. We initally had a call with Noelle, and were instantly very comfortable with her approach. Noelle was great to work with, very patient, was willing…

    Cheri Ondatje
  • Vey helpful with good insight to take the proper steps with difficult situations and have my questions answered. Noelle and her team are professional and courteous and great to work with!

    Corine Cojocaru
  • Samantha and the team are professional compassionate and get the job done. She articulates very well what needs to be done. Her and the firm do Probate and Trust at its finest to protect their clients. She…

    Silvana Sarkis
  • I was referred to NM Law after dealing with a myriad of problems in settling a complicated Trust in Riverside County. At the initial meeting, Noelle Minto and Samantha Smith listened to the mess I was in…

    Aleathea Rayburn
  • Love this firm. I’ve worked on a wide range of legal issues with NM law, and the attorneys here are top notch, reasonably priced, and a pleasure to work with. They truly care about each of their…

  • Ms. Minto, I want to thank you and your staff for the courtesy extended to us during our family’s pending emergency deadline. Mr. O’Grady spoke to my brother and gave us his best recommendation regarding my father’s…

    Abraham Torres

Charities We Support

We dedicate pro bono time, volunteer services, and a percentage of our gross revenue to these organizations. In 2023, we sponsored a refugee family of five to come to the United States and start a new life.

Each year our law firm decides as a group which charities to assist with our time, money, and expertise. Please feel free to click on any of the charities below and make a donation of your own.

  • Charities
  • Charities
  • Charities
  • Charities
  • Charities
  • Charities