Banner image

Can Trust Beneficiaries Sue Trustee for Rental Income?

News & Blog Apr 26, 2017

If you’ve been named as the beneficiary to a trust, are you entitled to the current proceeds from the trust property?

A California Court of Appeals said that before reaching that question, a party needs to have standing or a stake in the action to be in court. Read the details…

A recent case involved a revocable trust created by Marion Hanson that named her grandchildren Alison and Kevin as contingent beneficiaries. The trust’s main asset was a 70% interest in a single-family home where Marion lived until the end of 2013. The other 30% was owned by the two grandkids as individuals. Marion was the sole beneficiary of the trust for her lifetime.

Marion had transferred that 30% interest in the property to her then-living daughter Beverly, which later passed to Beverly’s husband David. When he died, the 30% interest was transferred to his estate, where it was held for the benefit of their two children (Marion’s grandchildren) Kevin and Alison. David’s brother Tracy was executor of David’s estate, and transferred the property interest to Kevin and Alison.

When Marion moved into an assisted living facility, the trustee Cynthia Palm rented out the home for $4,500 a month. That precipitated a dispute with Kevin and Alison regarding the distribution of the property’s rental income. Alison, Kevin, and their uncle, Tracy Jones (“the Joneses”), filed a civil action alleging that the trustee breached her fiduciary duties by failing to provide an accounting concerning the property and refusing to distribute any of the rental income.

The Joneses asserted that they were entitled to 30% of the rental income. The trustee, however, argued that Marion was entitled to retain all the rental income because she was paying the property expenses. The probate court denied without prejudice the trustee’s request for an order confirming her resignation as trustee and appointing Joan Adams as her successor.

On Palm’s remaining requests for orders approving her accounting and compelling the Trust to reimburse the attorneys’ fees incurred in the trust action, the court held the Tracy Jones lacked standing to object because he had no interest in the trust or the property. The court also concluded Alison and Kevin lacked standing to object as beneficiaries because it was a revocable trust, and Marion was still living—meaning that she could change or cancel the trust at any time.

However, the probate court did find that that the two grandkids did have standing to object to the trustee’s accounting and her request for fees because they held the 30% interest in the property. The probate court denied Palm’s request for an order confirming her resignation as trustee, and appointing a successor, and granting Palm’s request for trustee compensation.

Acting Presiding Judge Laurie D. Zelon explained her opinion for the Second District, Division Seven of the California Courts of Appeal that the Jones argued that the probate court erred in refusing to accept the resignation of Palm as trustee and declining to recognize the appointment of the successor trustee. To have standing on appeal, Judge Zelon wrote, “a person generally must be a party of record and sufficiently aggrieved by the judgment or order.”

“To be aggrieved, a party must have a legally cognizable immediate and substantial interest which is injuriously affected by the court’s decision. A nominal interest or remote consequence of the ruling does not satisfy this requirement.”

Kevin and Alison were beneficiaries of the trust, and because the trust was revocable, they had no right to act with respect to the trust, and “no legally cognizable interest in the Trust’s property during Hanson’s lifetime.” As a result, their status as beneficiaries gave them no right or interest that was “injuriously affected” by the probate court’s order regarding the trust’s internal affairs.

The grandchildren argued that even if they lack standing to appeal as beneficiaries, they still had standing based on their 30% interest in the property, claiming that they were “affected by and thereby have standing to participate in actions pertaining to trust administration to the extent it affects the [p]roperty.” Kevin and Alison cited no legal authority supporting their argument and didn’t identify any legally cognizable right or interest that they enjoyed as 30% owners of the property that was injured by the probate court’s order.

Although Judge Zelon and the Court of Appeals acknowledged that the trust may have owed Kevin and Alison certain duties because of their co-tenant relationship, the Court failed to see how this provided them standing to appeal an order regarding the trust’s internal affairs concerning the naming of successor and fees. If the two grandchildren believed the trust violated a duty owed to them as co-owners of the property, they were free to pursue their claims in the pending civil action. But their status as co-owners, Judge Zelon held, didn’t establish that they had any right that was injured by the probate court’s orders denying the trustee’s resignation request, and compelling the trust to pay the fees she incurred in the civil action.

As far as the uncle, who was the executor of David Jones’s estate, the appellate court said that although David’s estate previously held Alison and Kevin’s 30% interest in the for their benefit, Tracy transferred that interest from the estate to them. So, the uncle was out…in both his individual capacity and as executor of the estate. Tracy had no right or interest in the trust or in the property. Without a right or interest affected by the Probate Court’s order, he also lacked standing to appeal.

Parties should consult with an attorney if they believe they are beneficiaries of a Trust in order to understand whether they are actual/current beneficiaries, and to what extent they are beneficiaries of specific gifts and the remainder of the trust, after specific gifts are distributed. If a party is a contingent beneficiary they will have substantially less access to information or to intervention by the Court.

Because all the appellants lacked standing to appeal from the Probate Court’s order, the Court of Appeals had no jurisdiction to consider their appeal, and the appeal was dismissed. Jones v. Palm, 2017 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1165 (Cal.App. 2nd Dist. February 14, 2017).

Contact NM Law, APC (949-253-0000) to speak to a trust administration attorney. Contact us today to get answers to your questions about trusts, sub-trusts, trustees, trust assets, and beneficiaries.



Disclaimer: This article is intended to provide a general summary of laws in the State of California and should not be construed as a legal opinion nor a complete legal analysis of the subject matter. Noelle Minto is an attorney at NM Law, APC in Tustin, California, a law firm specializing in Trusts & Estates and Business Transactions.


Ms. Minto has been a business and estates transactional attorney based in California since 2003. Her practice is now located in Tustin, CA but represents individuals and entities based throughout the United States and abroad. Phone: (949) 253-0000, Email:


  • NM Law is an excellent law firm to work with! Noelle and her team are very thorough and knowledgeable. They explained the estate planning process to us and kept us informed every step of the way. We…

    Monique S
  • I greatly appreciate Noelle’s assistance in making difficult decisions. When she provides counsel I know she puts herself and her family in my shoes. I feel comfortable knowing my attorney has analyzed every angle and leaves out…

    Cinda H.
  • For those of you that are looking for the perfect attorney to handle any of your estate issues, well Noelle is the one for you! I can’t say enough about Noelle! She recently handled a case for…

    Suzie F.
  • One of the most important things you can do for your family is have a good Living Trust done by an attorney you can trust to take care of your business. I highly recommend Noelle Minto, an…

    Sandy Z.
  • Working with Noelle on litigation and transactional matters was truly a valuable experience for me. Not only was she a great communicator with clients and personnel, but zealous and passionate about her clients. I would recommend her…

    Darren S.
  • I’ve known Noelle as a colleague and friend for close to seven years. Working “across the aisle” in the fast-paced and partisan world of LA County politics, I found Noelle remarkable for her ability to quickly grasp…

    Kerjon L.
  • Noelle and her team were professional, courteous and diligent with my case. It was a small matter but they took it as though it was a large one. They reached a settlement quickly and very little effort…

    Doug S.
  • After my mother’s death, The bank locked all her accounts and the insurance company was playing games. Our family lawyer never call me back. I called Noelle for help! My paper work was not in order at…

    Randy B.
  • Noelle is awesome. Handled everything I needed in a timely manner. Very professional!

    Tammy W.
  • I have worked with Noelle on my Estate Planning and was very impressed by the way she handled my business. Noelle was extremely professional and available for all my questions. I would highly recommend anyone looking for…

    Zac C.
  • I have worked with many attorneys, and there are very few that I would ever recommend. Noelle and her team have gone above and beyond to help all of our clients that we have referred to her….

    Robert Sousa
  • I was first referred to Noelle Minto by my family law attorney Mike Monarch to provide oversight on my husband’s Trust conforming with our Post Marital Agreement. Her outstanding legal insights helped me to feel secure that…

    Sharon McCubbin
  • Noelle and Samantha and their team are amazing. They are extremely knowledgeable and professional (they are the best). They have and continue to support me and my family while dealing with my parents Will and Trust. Samantha…

    Greg Bishop
  • I had a great experience with Noelle and Samantha at NM Law. They were fast, clear and got the result we wanted under budget. I am very happy and impressed.

    John Arens
  • NM Law is an exceptional place to work! Our office is located in the City of Tustin, off the 55 Freeway, between the 5 and 405 Freeways. Our main cross streets are Redhill Avenue and Edinger Avenue…

    Samantha Smith
  • The N.W Law team in Tustin Ca was instrumental in achieving a just result in our family trust dispute. We had the privilege of being represented by Samantha Smith and her staff, during one of my saddest…

    Herman baldonado
  • Amazing service. So happy with the whole team!

    Mitchell Hilde
  • So glad to work with this team of professionals

    Noelle Minto
  • As an attorney who has used two other wills & trusts lawyers prior to seeing Noelle, I have a pretty good idea of what to expect and what it should cost. I recommend Noelle to anyone who…

    Lynne Boisineau
  • Highly recommend NM Law. I recently worked with Noelle and her team on my family trust and the process could not have gone smoother. Very knowledgeable and professional. I have since recommended all of my family members…

    Nathan Perkins
  • A very professional approach and action to fulfill our personal requirements

    Waldo ortega
  • My husband and I decided to update our 12 year old trust. We initally had a call with Noelle, and were instantly very comfortable with her approach. Noelle was great to work with, very patient, was willing…

    Cheri Ondatje
  • Vey helpful with good insight to take the proper steps with difficult situations and have my questions answered. Noelle and her team are professional and courteous and great to work with!

    Corine Cojocaru
  • Samantha and the team are professional compassionate and get the job done. She articulates very well what needs to be done. Her and the firm do Probate and Trust at its finest to protect their clients. She…

    Silvana Sarkis
  • I was referred to NM Law after dealing with a myriad of problems in settling a complicated Trust in Riverside County. At the initial meeting, Noelle Minto and Samantha Smith listened to the mess I was in…

    Aleathea Rayburn
  • Love this firm. I’ve worked on a wide range of legal issues with NM law, and the attorneys here are top notch, reasonably priced, and a pleasure to work with. They truly care about each of their…

  • Ms. Minto, I want to thank you and your staff for the courtesy extended to us during our family’s pending emergency deadline. Mr. O’Grady spoke to my brother and gave us his best recommendation regarding my father’s…

    Abraham Torres

Charities We Support

We dedicate pro bono time, volunteer services, and a percentage of our gross revenue to these organizations. In 2023, we sponsored a refugee family of five to come to the United States and start a new life.

Each year our law firm decides as a group which charities to assist with our time, money, and expertise. Please feel free to click on any of the charities below and make a donation of your own.

  • Charities
  • Charities
  • Charities
  • Charities
  • Charities
  • Charities